July 21, 2013 81 Comments
When Jesus said we must eat His flesh and drink his blood, he wasn’t talking about cannibalism, but he was referring to ingestion that leads to incarnation. Christ is the Word that became flesh. It is important that we ingest the Word of God in a way that causes us to digest His life until Christ is literally formed in us. Ingestion without digestion will lead to feeling full but not being transformed. Digestion is more than just a taste test, it is the full meal of His presence that conforms us to His image. There is an old saying that is true in this case, “You are what you eat!“
Many people ingest the Bible but they don’t digest the living, active Word of God. Religion fills their souls but never satisfies their longing for real life. Digestion requires assimilation, not just consumption. Truth was never meant to just be recounted, it was intended to be experienced. When we exchange the communion meal for a dinner commentary or a cookbook, we deprive ourselves of the privilege of abundant life, and relegate ourselves to a meager existence in the Kingdom. [Tuesday, July 16, 2013; emphasis added]
How do we interpret Kris Vallotton’s message? The key is in the word incarnation. Of course, the Incarnation of Jesus Christ occurred when the Word, the second ‘Person’ of the Trinity “became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14). This took place at the moment of the Virginal Conception (Luke 1:35). But, do Christians become an incarnation?
While there are a few different meanings for the term incarnation, as it applies to Jesus Christ it implies preexistence, as in the preexistent, eternal Word, the second ‘Person’ of the Trinity took on a new mode of existence as the one, unique God in the flesh. The fully God and yet fully man Jesus Christ IS the Incarnation. And since, according to orthodox Christianity, humans are not preexistent, then humans cannot become an incarnation in that sense of the term. (However, those who believe in the preexistence of souls affirm reincarnation – not a Christian doctrine, specifically deemed anathema at the Second Ecumenical Council of Constantinople, or Constantinople II of 553 AD.)
So what does Kris Vallotton mean? Certainly, he’s adhering to the typical Word of Faith (WoF) doctrine of ‘new revelation’ (what Vallotton terms “living, active Word of God” above), or as Kenneth E. Hagin termed it, the “rhema” word. According to WoF, these ‘new revelations’ are superior to Scripture, the written Word (Hagin called this the “logos” word). But what does that have to do with becoming an incarnation?
The other modern day definitions for the term incarnation are used in a figurative sense, yet it’s clear Vallotton is speaking literally, as he states, “until Christ is literally formed in us”. Taking the context of Vallotton’s message above, this seems similar to an old and oft-repeated quote by Hagin:
Every man who has been ‘born again’ is an Incarnation, and Christianity is a miracle. The believer is as much an Incarnation as was Jesus of Nazareth.1
Hagin equates the Incarnate Word of God to the ‘born again’ believer. Others have stated something similar, and here are two examples from Earl Paulk – one who taught explicit Latter Rain doctrine as well as WoF:
…It was the quickening and bringing alive of the Word which was incarnate in Jesus Christ. That Word became incarnate in the Church.
…Jesus was the firstfruit of God’s incarnation, a man living out God’s perfect will. Now He says, “…My people will bring forth life as they become the ‘incarnate Word’ on planet Earth”…the Church is the ‘ongoing expression’ of God.2
All things have been given to us, even to the point of allowing us to share the divine nature of Jesus. Sharing His nature is a definition of the ongoing incarnation of God on the earth. ‘Christ in us, the hope of glory.’ His inheritance is already ours…3
While Vallotton has not gone so far as to declare the Church body “the ongoing incarnation of God on the earth”, he’s not very far off. More important though is that if one reads the Vallotton quote carefully, one sees that the ‘believer’ becomes the ‘new revelation’ word made flesh. Does this mean that, in the Vallotton quote, Jesus Christ was also the ‘new revelation’ word made flesh rather than the Word, the second ‘Person’ of the Trinity made flesh at the Virginal Conception as the unique fully God and fully man, as the Hagin and Paulk selections above seem to imply?
To see that this interpretation of ‘believer’ as ‘new revelation’ word made flesh is indeed the correct understanding, we’ll go through the above Vallotton quote sentence by sentence.
When Jesus said we must eat His flesh and drink his blood, he wasn’t talking about cannibalism, but he was referring to ingestion that leads to incarnation.
This means simply that partaking of Communion leads to “incarnation”.
Christ is the Word that became flesh. It is important that we ingest the Word of God in a way that causes us to digest His life until Christ is literally formed in us.
These two sentences are the most crucial as far as interpretation. Here, we’ll have to make an initial hypothesis which will prove itself as we continue. First, note the two uses of “the Word” above. From a strictly orthodox perspective, the first sentence would be speaking of Jesus Christ as the eternal Word made flesh at the Virginal Conception. But is this what Vallotton means? We’ll return to this later.
Regarding the second, this could refer to either Scripture, or the ‘new revelation’ word. However, in the second paragraph of the complete quote, Vallotton is clear that he’s referring to the ‘new revelation’ word, since he’s made a direct comparison between this and Scripture, with the ‘new revelation’ word the one to be “experienced”. Therefore, for now we’ll tentatively conclude that this is the intended meaning here, as this Word “causes us to digest His life until Christ is literally formed in us”.
Ingestion without digestion will lead to feeling full but not being transformed. Digestion is more than just a taste test, it is the full meal of His presence that conforms us to His image. There is an old saying that is true in this case, “You are what you eat!”
Here “the Word” is personified as “His presence”. Also, this implies that Holy Communion consists of the real presence, just as it does in the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox, Lutheranism, and only a few others within Protestantism. The majority of Protestant churches deny the real presence in Holy Communion, seeing it as symbolic instead. For Vallotton, “His presence”, that is, the ‘real presence’ in Communion, literally makes the ‘believer’ become that which was ingested: “the Word”.
Many people ingest the Bible but they don’t digest the living, active Word of God. Religion fills their souls but never satisfies their longing for real life.
The message in these two sentences is that reading (“ingesting”) the Bible results in “religion”, the term used pejoratively; whereas, the “living, active Word of God” (“His life” and “His presence” in the first paragraph), i.e., the ‘new revelation’ word brings “real life”. By positing this false dichotomy between the Bible and ‘new revelation’, this confirms the earlier working hypothesis that the ‘new revelation’ word was the intended meaning in the first paragraph.
Digestion requires assimilation, not just consumption. Truth was never meant to just be recounted, it was intended to be experienced.
Studying and memorizing Scripture is not the real goal. The “truth” of these ‘new revelations’ is to be digested, experienced, assimilated. This is the goal.
When we exchange the communion meal for a dinner commentary or a cookbook, we deprive ourselves of the privilege of abundant life, and relegate ourselves to a meager existence in the Kingdom.
If Holy Communion is viewed as symbolic, rather than the ‘real presence’ of “the Word”, i.e. ‘new revelation’, then we become a spiritual ‘have-not’ instead of a spiritual ‘have’. Why? Because it’s “important that we ingest the Word of God in a way that causes us to digest His life until Christ is literally formed in us.” If we don’t “ingest the Word of God” in this way, then “Christ” will not be formed in us, literally.
But, what does all this really mean? The mystery and confusion evaporate when this is viewed from a Gnostic, or, more specifically, a Neo-Gnostic (New Age / New Spirituality) perspective. First, we’ll need to provide a brief sketch of a basic Neo-Gnostic conception, keeping in mind that this is a perversion of Christianity.
In the Neo-Gnostic (New Age / New Spirituality) conception of deity, there is an eternal trinity consisting of the Father, the Holy Breath (sometimes Mother), and Christ (the logos, usually the offspring of the first two). Christ is “the Word of God”, the “word” of Thought, Force and Love. This “word” formed the entire cosmos, leaving a part of himself in all of creation, alternatively known as a seed, spark, Christ. Therefore, the eternal word (third person of this false trinity, as opposed to second in orthodox Christianity) is the ‘Christ without’, while the internal seed/spark in everything is the “Christ within”.4 This is the doctrine of panentheism, that is, God is within all, yet simultaneously transcendent.
In the Gnostic understanding, mankind has two natures, one human and one divine spark/seed, or ‘Christ within’. In order for humans to progress spiritually, the goal is to awaken the ‘Christ within’ (Christ in you, the hope of glory – a perversion of Colossians 1:27) via the “Christ without”, i.e., the “word” which provides “Thought and Force”,5 or ‘new revelation’. As one increases in ‘new revelation’ knowledge, one progresses spiritually.6 This progression occurs over multiple lifetimes, as the spark/seed is then reincarnated into a succession of human forms.
Though “Christ” (divine seed/spark) was yet still latent in humanity, due to ‘selfishness’, most of the human race did not recognize this and, thus, was not progressing as it should. This necessitated that the eternal Christ (of this false trinity), the “Word of God”, be made manifest in human form “by taking his abode in some pure person”.7 That “pure person” was Jesus of Nazareth. This “Word of God”, ‘new revelation’ of “Thought and Force”, became flesh in the man Jesus at baptism, specifically when the dove (Holy Breath) landed upon him. This is when the incarnation of the “Word of God” began.8
Once ‘the Word’ was “made flesh” in Jesus of Nazareth at baptism, Jesus became the model for all towards their own spiritual progression, for their own self-redemption. The goal then for mankind is for each one to become his own ‘word made flesh’, to become his own incarnation, by recognizing the divine seed/spark within, and then begin its path towards actualization.9 This false Jesus instructs others: “Look to the Christ within who shall be formed in every one of you, as he is formed in me.”10 What was it that Vallotton wrote above? “It is important that we ingest the Word of God in a way that causes us to digest His life until Christ is literally formed in us.”
Viewing Vallotton’s complete statement from a New-Gnostic perspective works well indeed. Using Neo-Gnosticism as our lens with which to view this statement, we can see how to interpret “Christ is the Word that became flesh”, and this adds clarity to the entire Vallotton quote.
As regards Vallotton’s references to Holy Communion, we’ll compare to material on a Gnostic website. Please note that there are many different flavors of Gnosticism, with each one borrowing from other religions and occult traditions. This particular one incorporates Hinduism, Jewish mysticism to include the Kabbalah, Tantric Yoga, and others into its own mix of Gnosticism. Also, as a side note, the reader may have recognized that Hagin referred to the ‘new revelation’ word as the “rhema”, while above (and below) it was used as the “logos” instead. This is not unusual, as terms are not necessarily consistent, though concepts usually are.
Jesus says that man cannot live upon this bread alone, this bread of Moses. In other words, the teaching that Moses gives is vital, it is important, but it is not enough; there is something else. And that something else is the Word of God, as Jesus says. But here we have to look deeper than the literal meaning. Some interpret this passage as meaning that we need the scripture or the Bible in order to have life, but this is only a literal, superficial meaning of the phrase. The document from which the quote is taken was written in Greek, and in Greek, ‘word’ is ‘logos’…11
Just like Vallotton, we have to look beyond the literal meaning of Jesus’ words in John 6, we must “look deeper” for the mystical meaning, as per the Gnostic quote above, for if we don’t, then this will result in “not being transformed”, per Vallotton. The Bible is not enough.
…In other words, man cannot live by bread alone…but by the Word of God, by the Logos, by the Christ. So he is pointing out a very important mystery that we need to comprehend….
…receive the blessed elements so they can take those atoms [of the Christ] into their bodies as assistance for their work.
…these elements which will house the forces of Christ (the Logos) so that the congregation can receive those forces.12
As Vallotton concluded his first paragraph, “You are what you eat!” This is what he means by “His life” and “His presence” in the first paragraph. But, whose life and presence is this really? All this reminds me once again of the following Alice Bailey quote, only this time I’ll place other emphasis:
…[T]he church movement, like all else, is but a temporary expedient and serves but as a transient resting place for the evolving life. Eventually, there will appear the Church Universal, and its definite outlines will appear towards the close of this [20th] century…This Church will be nurtured into activity by the Christ [ED: the false Christ above, actually Satan/antichrist] and His disciples when the outpouring of the Christ principle [ED: spirit of the ‘new revelation’ word], the true second Coming, has been accomplished…
The Christian church in its many branches can serve as a St. John the Baptist, as a voice crying in the wilderness, and as a nucleus through which world illumination may be accomplished…The church must show a wide tolerance…The church as a teaching factor should take the great basic doctrines and (shattering the old forms in which they are expressed and held) show their true and inner spiritual significance [ED: occult/esoteric meaning]. The prime work of the church is to teach, and teach ceaselessly, preserving the outer appearance in order to reach the many who are accustomed to church usages. Teachers must be trained; Bible knowledge must be spread; the sacraments must be mystically interpreted, and the power of the church to heal must be demonstrated.13
1 Kenneth E. Hagin “The Incarnation” in The Word of Faith, (1980, December; #13) Kenneth Hagin Ministries, Tulsa, OK, p 14, as quoted in Russell Sharrock Covenant Theology: A Critical Analysis of Current Pentecostal Covenant Theology, 2006, Lulu Enterprises, Morrisville, NC, p 109. Emphasis added.
2 Paulk, Earl. Held in the Heavens Until…God’s Strategy for Planet Earth, 1985; K Dimension, Atlanta, GA, p 163. Emphasis added.
3 Paulk, Held in the Heavens, p 197. Emphasis added.
4 Levi Dowling The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ: The Philosophic and Practical Basis of the Religion of the Aquarian Age of the World, © 1907 Eva S. Dowling and Leo W. Dowling, © 1935 and © 1964 Leo W. Dowling, (11th printing, 1987), DeVorss, Marina del Rey, CA, p 6. Dowling is cited as merely one Neo-Gnostic text, but there are many others, with subtle differences in basic doctrine. However, Dowling’s very closely matches the Vallotton quote, and hence, serves our purposes here.
5 Dowling Aquarian Gospel, p 6
6 Dowling Aquarian Gospel, pp 6-7
7 Dowling Aquarian Gospel, p 7
8 Dowling Aquarian Gospel, p 8. The point at which this false incarnation begins is detailed: …Jesus was man; Christ was Divine Love – the Love of God; and after thirty years of strenuous life the man had made his body fit to be the temple of the holy breath and Love took full possession, and John well said when he declared: “And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld the glory of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.”
9 Dowling Aquarian Gospel, p 8
10 Dowling Aquarian Gospel, p 8
11 “Gnostic Instructor” “Sacrament of Communion” gnosticteachings.org website <http://gnosticteachings.org/courses/sacraments-of-the-gnostic-church/666-sacrament-of-communion.html>, as accessed 07/20/13, © Glorian Publishing, Brooklyn, NY; emphasis added.
12 “Gnostic Instructor” “Sacrament of Communion”
13 Alice A. Bailey The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, © 1957 Lucis, NY, 6th printing 1981; Fort Orange Press, Albany, NY, pp 510-511. Underscore from italics in original; other emphasis added. While the book was not published until 1957, most sections within the book have corresponding dates of initial writing, or, more accurately, transmission. The portion quoted here is from 1919, some of the earliest writings of Bailey/The Tibetan.